Aggression Strategy

+1 Attack to all units. +30 cost to all units. -1 range for Infantry. +1 range to tanks.

Edited.

Sounds like a stupid idea, RA is practically this but better.

كتب بواسطة Fockmeeard, 19.06.2014 at 11:53

+1 Attack to all units. +40 cost to all units. +2 maintenance cost to all units. -1 range for Infantry. +1 range to tanks. -2 range for ATs.

your nerfs far outweight the boosts. maintenace is 10% of total unit cost so by adding +40 cost youre adding +4 maint. i wouldnt use this strat, tunders right its practically ra

What about a strategy that's similar in concept to imperialist but just the opposite? Imperialist reduces the cost of all units whilst nerfing their attacks to compensate for the buff. So something like +50 cost to all units but +(3 or 5) to attack/defence to all units where the cost is increased to all units whilst buffing their attacks, defence, or both to compensate for the nerf. Make it ridiculously expensive, but make the units bought strong enough. Wondering how that might affect players playing smaller countries to save enough money to spawn overpowered, but few units. This is not something that I've completely thought through though. Just poking at the idea.

كتب بواسطة Leaf, 19.06.2014 at 12:40

What about a strategy that's similar in concept to imperialist but just the opposite? Imperialist reduces the cost of all units whilst nerfing their attacks to compensate for the buff. So something like +50 cost to all units but +(3 or 5) to attack/defence to all units where the cost is increased to all units whilst buffing their attacks, defence, or both to compensate for the nerf. Make it ridiculously expensive, but make the units bought strong enough. Wondering how that might affect players playing smaller countries to save enough money to spawn overpowered, but few units. This is not something that I've completely thought through though. Just poking at the idea.

+1 HP + 30 cost to all units?

كتب بواسطة Leaf, 19.06.2014 at 12:40

What about a strategy that's similar in concept to imperialist but just the opposite? Imperialist reduces the cost of all units whilst nerfing their attacks to compensate for the buff. So something like +50 cost to all units but +(3 or 5) to attack/defence to all units where the cost is increased to all units whilst buffing their attacks, defence, or both to compensate for the nerf. Make it ridiculously expensive, but make the units bought strong enough. Wondering how that might affect players playing smaller countries to save enough money to spawn overpowered, but few units. This is not something that I've completely thought through though. Just poking at the idea.

That's exactly the idea that I had. Except I thought +1 attack and +30 cost would be too OP.

كتب بواسطة Leaf, 19.06.2014 at 12:40

What about a strategy that's similar in concept to imperialist but just the opposite? Imperialist reduces the cost of all units whilst nerfing their attacks to compensate for the buff. So something like +50 cost to all units but +(3 or 5) to attack/defence to all units where the cost is increased to all units whilst buffing their attacks, defence, or both to compensate for the nerf. Make it ridiculously expensive, but make the units bought strong enough. Wondering how that might affect players playing smaller countries to save enough money to spawn overpowered, but few units. This is not something that I've completely thought through though. Just poking at the idea.

The concept of it is LB to an extent. LB is too weak tho.

Wow, guys. It was just an open thought, no need to be so demanding :'(


I do think it would be an interesting strategy if there is any way in balancing it.